No such thing as one best way summary Essay

a. What are the occasions trying to do in writing this?Whilst this is non empirical research and relies solely on theoretical arguments, Burns does evince the shortcomings of the change contingency model. He attempts to usher that organisations have choices which are non utilised which results in significant, negative, implications. b. What are the authors saying which is relevant to what I motivation to find out? Change could be planned but only if in a stable environment. Change, in this situation would be, incremental, not transformational, and sottish of a more direct approach and presumes that common agreements are reached. but Burns suggest the emerging approach is more important in turbulent environments and situations. He also argues that change is part of learning not just the opportunity to create something new. This idea does link to the contingency opening such that organisations and leaders can manipulate contingencies to align with their own styles and agendas. This is a negative aspect which could be viewed as morally incorrect. Change approaches moldiness match the environment and situation though exercising choice origin on alternatives not a single best way. c. How convincing is the authors argument?Although not empirically based this is a unattackable argument. Burns has a very good reputation in the celestial orbit of change leadership/management. However it would be necessary to find spare evidence to support or counter these views. The RAVEN test is passed as there is no empirical research therefore we can require that this paper is simply an academic view. d. In conclusion, what ingestion can I make of this?This could be linked to the paper by Zhu et al to show how transformational leadership can be a good approach to see to it moral decision making and actions are present when dealing with emergent change as this requires a number of contingencies which leaders and followers could use too support long term organisational change.